This Sunday is Easter. So I was looking for Easter hats for Rose.

[As an aside, don’t you wish hats would come back in vogue? All those frilly Easter hats, especially from the 40s, look like so much fun.]

Back to the matter at hand… I was looking for Easter hats, perusing the Sears Catalog when a phrase I saw as I whizzed through pages stopped me in my tracks.

 

31899_B011775-00024
From the Spring 1929 Sears Catalog

 

Tub what???? Who would name a dress that? And why?

And why are they so hideous looking?

Easter hats forgotten, I started trying to solve the mystery of the Terrible Tub Frock.

It was no easy task. I had to call in the professionals (my friend Tara, Queen of the Search Engines).

And just what did she help me learn?

Well, despite its very odd name, a tub frock is just a lightweight summer day dress that can be washed… i.e. thrown in the tub.

That’s it. Mystery solved.

They’ve been around since about 19091 (at least that’s the earliest reference found). And girls who are “thickly made” should avoid them: “It is a safe rule that all tub frocks should be short, a trying doctrine perhaps for those who are not blessed with slim ankles, but fashion is never kind to the thickly made girl2…”

And finally, they’re perfect for “morning marketing, business, beach, or picnic wear” and even suitable for informal afternoons.3

I also determined that they aren’t all hideous. These tub frocks, shown in the May 1923 Pictorial Review, are pretty cute.

 

effectiveversionss07192011-1

1925 Print Ad for Tub Frocks

 

I wonder how the muumuu craze of the 1970s will affect unwary researchers eighty some-odd years in the future? I hope they have an easier time of it than I had with tub dresses!

And now, poor Rose will be wearing last year’s Easter hat, all because of those danged tub frocks!

(One tiny bit of trivia before I go: Easter headwear did not earn the moniker Easter Bonnet until after 1933 when Irving Berlin coined it as such in his song Easter Parade.)

References

  1. Chicago Tribune, 1909 ↩︎
  2. Women’s Encyclopedia ↩︎
  3. Spokane Spokesman, 1923 ↩︎


Comments

2 responses to “A tub what?”

  1. I don’t know, Taylor. Most of the dress fashions you’ve shared, I’ve liked, but this one makes me really glad I don’t have to wear one. I’m sure I’d resemble a tub with appendages if I had to wear any one of those frocks.
    But, until I read this, I’d never heard of voile or pongee. I do agree with you about wishing hats were back in vogue. Perhaps we can start the rage? I love my hats. They’re excellent sun protection.

  2. Er, yea, I think I’d have to be a good 8 inches taller and much less, er, thick, to wear those with any kind of elegance…
    It’s funny to think that back in the day when laundry was such a difficult, endless chore, clothes used yards and yards more fabric than they ever do now.

Leave a Reply